home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Space & Astronomy
/
Space and Astronomy (October 1993).iso
/
mac
/
TEXT
/
SPACEDIG
/
V16_2
/
V16NO276.TXT
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1993-07-13
|
12KB
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 93 05:17:59
From: Space Digest maintainer <digests@isu.isunet.edu>
Reply-To: Space-request@isu.isunet.edu
Subject: Space Digest V16 #276
To: Space Digest Readers
Precedence: bulk
Space Digest Fri, 5 Mar 93 Volume 16 : Issue 276
Today's Topics:
Alternative space station design
Apollo Moon Missions ?
Fallen Angels
Getting people into S
Low Earth Orbit in a Mars Blimp?
NASP (was Re: Canadian SS
Spy Sats (Was: Are La (2 msgs)
Supernova may have caused huge void around solar system
Welcome to the Space Digest!! Please send your messages to
"space@isu.isunet.edu", and (un)subscription requests of the form
"Subscribe Space <your name>" to one of these addresses: listserv@uga
(BITNET), rice::boyle (SPAN/NSInet), utadnx::utspan::rice::boyle
(THENET), or space-REQUEST@isu.isunet.edu (Internet).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 4 Mar 93 20:34:37 GMT
From: Josh Hopkins <jbh55289@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Alternative space station design
Newsgroups: sci.space
gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman) writes:
>In article <1993Mar3.194542.5295@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> Dr. Norman J. LaFave <lafave@ial4.jsc.nasa.gov> writes:
>>
>>The U.S.has had 6 RTG re-entries with not one leak. The USSR
>>had one rupture in Canada, but it was found to have insufficient
>>shielding. The safety issue is one of perception.
>The Canadian re-entry was a *reactor* not an RTG. Much nastier.
Numerous people have pointed this out, but nobody has taken issue with the
claim of 6 reentries. I'm aware of only three relevant spacecraft failures,
of which one wasn't a reentry and one "leaked successfully."
Can someone explain what the other three were, or alternatively, reassure me
that I'm not senile?
--
Josh Hopkins jbh55289@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
You only live once. But if you live it right, once is enough.
In memoria, WDH
------------------------------
Date: 4 Mar 93 07:44:00 GMT
From: Roland Dobbins <roland.dobbins@the-matrix.com>
Subject: Apollo Moon Missions ?
Newsgroups: sci.space
TT>
TT>From: tjt@Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Tim Thompson)
TT>Newsgroups: sci.space
TT>Subject: Apollo Moon Missions ?
TT>Date: 25 Feb 1993 01:23:36 GMT
TT>Message-ID: <1mh72oINNdu8@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>
TT>Reply-To: tjt@Jpl.Nasa.Gov
TT>
TT> I am ignorant, I admit it. My memory has failed. Can someone ref
TT>tired brain cells, and tell me (us) which Apollo mission to the Moo
TT>last one? There couldn't have been too many.
TT>
TT> Mille Mercis
TT>
TT>---
TT>------------------------------------------------------------
TT>Timothy J. Thompson, Earth and Space Sciences Division, JPL.
TT>Assistant Administrator, Division Science Computing Network.
TT>Secretary, Los Angeles Astronomical Society.
TT>Member, BOD, Mount Wilson Observatory Association.
TT>
TT>INTERnet/BITnet: tjt@scn1.jpl.nasa.gov
TT>NSI/DECnet: jplsc8::tim
TT>SCREAMnet: YO!! TIM!!
TT>GPSnet: 118:10:22.85 W by 34:11:58.27 N
TT>
Apollo 17. I believe that Gene Cernan was the last human to walk on the
surface of the Moon.
Missions were planned through Apollo 21, but funding was cut due to
Vietnam, etc.
---
. Orator V1.13 . [Windows Qwk Reader Unregistered Evaluation Copy]
------------------------------
Date: 4 Mar 93 07:44:00 GMT
From: Roland Dobbins <roland.dobbins@the-matrix.com>
Subject: Fallen Angels
Newsgroups: sci.space
FN>
FN>From: m0102@tnc.UUCP (FRANK NEY)
FN>Newsgroups: sci.space,sci.energy,rec.arts.sf.fandom
FN>Subject: Fallen Angels
FN>Message-ID: <2001@tnc.UUCP>
FN>Date: 25 Feb 93 13:01:26 GMT
FN>Reply-To: m0102@tnc.UUCP (FRANK NEY)
FN>Followup-To: sci.space
FN>
FN>In the SF book 'Fallen Angels' by Larry Niven & others, a launch
FN>vehicle named PHOENIX was described. In the afterward, it was clai
FN>that such a launch vehicle (SSTO/VTOL) could be build for $50M-200M
FN>
FN>Anyone have information on the design of this critter?
FN>
FN>The story itself has much to recommend it and I would urge others t
FN>read it. It describes the story of two astronauts shot down over t
FN>US, after the turn of the century where the greens and the politica
FN>(in-)correct have taken over.
FN>
FN>The astronauts are rescued and returned to their space station (usi
FN>PHOENIX prototype) through the efforts of SF Fandom and the SCA. V
FN>entertaining and quite thought-provoking.
FN>
FN>Frank Ney N4ZHG EMT-A NRA ILA GOA CCRTKBA "M-O-U-S-E"
FN>Commandant and Acting President, Northern Virginia Free Militia
FN>Send e-mail for an application and more information
FN>----------------------------------------------------------------
FN>"Whether the authorities be invaders or merely local tyrants, the
FN>effect of such [gun] laws is to place the individual at the mercy o
FN>the state, unable to resist."
FN> - Robert Heinlein, in a 1949 letter concerning "Red Planet"
FN>--
FN>The Next Challenge - Public Access Unix in Northern Va. - Washingto
FN>703-803-0391 To log in for trial and account info.
_Fallen Angels_ is by Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle, and Steven Barnes.
Niven and Pournelle have done many many other books together, such as
_Footfall_, _The Mote in God's Eye_, _The Gripping Hand_, etc.
They also formed the Citizens' Advisory Council on National S[ace Policy,
which sold Ronald Reagan on the idea of SDI.
Phoenix is the brainchild of Gary Hudson, who appeared as himself in the
book. He can be reaced on BIX as "ghudson".
---
. Orator V1.13 . [Windows Qwk Reader Unregistered Evaluation Copy]
------------------------------
Date: 4 Mar 93 07:44:00 GMT
From: Roland Dobbins <roland.dobbins@the-matrix.com>
Subject: Getting people into S
Newsgroups: sci.space
JL>Could that be the vehicle commonly called the flying Bumble Bee, wh
JL>clai to fame in the ordinary world is the vehicle that opened the s
JL>and each episode of the six million dollar man. If I recall correct
JL>was aeronautically considered to be unflyable, but flew anyway and
JL>for a while touted as a great instrument for flight to and from low
JL>orbit. It finally crashed on descent when it touched down and did a
JL>up unfortunately a Helo was in the way and the two collided as the
JL>goes. I think That its prototypes and other s are still on display
JL>the yearly aeronautical show at Edwards airforce base.
As I recall, that particular lifting body was called the HL-10, and it
was most certainly _not_ designed *not* to fly . . . .
---
. Orator V1.13 . [Windows Qwk Reader Unregistered Evaluation Copy]
------------------------------
Date: 4 Mar 93 19:31:29 GMT
From: INNES MATTHEW <innes@ecf.toronto.edu>
Subject: Low Earth Orbit in a Mars Blimp?
Newsgroups: sci.space
In article <1993Mar4.043348.7894@ke4zv.uucp> gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman) writes:
>I said roughly the same thing Henry, but now I'm wondering. Is a supersonic
>blimp possible? Might be an interesting civil transport design, a VTOL SST.
I would think that it's probably not possible; not with the materials we have
now, and not on this planet.
The big problem, assuming you already have a power source capable of pushing
a barn door at Mach1, is to keep the nose from caving in. This is already
a problem with the (fairly low) speeds used now. Reinforcing the nose
enough to keep it rigid would probably make the craft far too heavy. Also,
the turbulence experienced in passing the sound barrier would, I think, be
enough to do in any LTA we could build.
I'd still love to see one, though...
--
Matt Innes
<innes@ecf.toronto.edu>
------------------------------
Date: 4 Mar 93 07:44:00 GMT
From: Roland Dobbins <roland.dobbins@the-matrix.com>
Subject: NASP (was Re: Canadian SS
Newsgroups: sci.space
CO>
CO>From: C.O.EGALON@LARC.NASA.GOV (CLAUDIO OLIVEIRA EGALON)
CO>Newsgroups: sci.space
CO>Subject: NASP (was Re: Canadian SSF effort ?? )
CO>Date: 20 Feb 1993 19:44:50 GMT
CO>Message-ID: <1m61niINNfth@rave.larc.nasa.gov>
CO>Reply-To: C.O.EGALON@LARC.NASA.GOV (CLAUDIO OLIVEIRA EGALON)
CO>
CO>> Aerospace Daily also reports that NASA research
CO>> on advanced subsonic and supersonic transport aircraft would
CO>> get a big increase under Clinton's budget plan, with $550
CO>> million more programmed in fiscal years 1994-97, and another
CO>> $267 million scheduled for FY '98.
CO>
CO>What about NASP???
CO>
CO>
Errr . . . that _is_ NASP.
It's SSX I'm worried about . . .
---
. Orator V1.13 . [Windows Qwk Reader Unregistered Evaluation Copy]
------------------------------
Date: 4 Mar 93 07:44:00 GMT
From: Roland Dobbins <roland.dobbins@the-matrix.com>
Subject: Spy Sats (Was: Are La
Newsgroups: sci.space
DA>
DA>Newsgroups: sci.space
DA>From: dnadams@nyx.cs.du.edu (Dean Adams)
DA>Subject: Re: Spy Sats (Was: Are La
DA>Message-ID: <1993Feb23.113753.178@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
DA>Date: Tue, 23 Feb 93 11:37:53 GMT
DA>
DA>In article <13628.409.uupcb@the-matrix.com> roland.dobbins@the-matr
DA>>DA>That report has been around a while... DoD's GROUND based trac
DA>>DA>were certainly used and perhaps even one of their airborne plat
DA>>DA>it may just be the press jumping to conclusions to think any sa
DA>>DA>involved. KH-11 orbits are not all that much higher than the s
DA>>DA>would make an intercept pretty tight, and besides the optics ar
DA>>
DA>>KH-11 is neither the latest nor the greatest "real-time" platform
DA>>
DA>
DA>The ADVANCED KH-11 is... we currently have 2-3 of them up.
DA>
DA>OR, are you talking about Lacrosse or Aurora?
DA>
Yes, among others . . .
Although those two are primarily ELINT/SIGINT.
---
. Orator V1.13 . [Windows Qwk Reader Unregistered Evaluation Copy]
------------------------------
Date: 4 Mar 93 07:44:00 GMT
From: Roland Dobbins <roland.dobbins@the-matrix.com>
Subject: Spy Sats (Was: Are La
Newsgroups: sci.space
DA>Actually, I thought they had most of the basic stuff down pretty we
DA>although some was certainly exaggerated at least a bit. Advanced K
DA>are supposed to have "near real time" imaging capability, but that
DA>does not translate into the continuous view they portrayed. The BI
DA>however was that their operation was at NIGHT, and these satellites
DA>placed into sun-synchronous polar orbits to optimize their daylight
DA>I do not believe they have a significant nighttime imaging capabili
DA>
........
DA>That report has been around a while... DoD's GROUND based tracking
DA>were certainly used and perhaps even one of their airborne platform
DA>it may just be the press jumping to conclusions to think any satell
DA>involved. KH-11 orbits are not all that much higher than the shutt
DA>would make an intercept pretty tight, and besides the optics are ob
KH-11 is neither the latest nor the greatest "real-time" platform up there.
---
. Orator V1.13 . [Windows Qwk Reader Unregistered Evaluation Copy]
------------------------------
Date: 4 Mar 93 14:12:06 GMT
From: Del Cotter <mt90dac@brunel.ac.uk>
Subject: Supernova may have caused huge void around solar system
Newsgroups: sci.space
tes@motif.jsc.nasa.gov. (Thomas E. Smith) writes:
>> Now, researchers at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center,
>>Greenbelt, Md., say evidence suggests it was formed by the
>>supernova or explosion of a star known as Geminga about 340,000
>>years ago.
>
> Where did this star that no one has seen for hundreds of thousands of
>years get its name?
I understood it's a contraction of GEMINi GAmma-ray source.
I could be wrong.
--
',' ' ',',' | | ',' ' ',','
', ,',' | Del Cotter mt90dac@brunel.ac.uk | ', ,','
',' | | ','
------------------------------
End of Space Digest Volume 16 : Issue 276
------------------------------